Implausible alternatives in eliciting multi-attribute value functions

DOI10.1016/J.EJOR.2013.09.016zbMath1305.91116OpenAlexW1979555383MaRDI QIDQ2256192

Rudolf Vetschera, Wolfgang Weitzl, Elisabeth Wolfsteiner

Publication date: 19 February 2015

Published in: European Journal of Operational Research (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.09.016

zbMATH Keywords

multiple criteria analysisconjoint analysispreference learningimplausible alternatives

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Decision theory (91B06) Individual preferences (91B08)

Related Items (4)

Best-worst tradeoff method ⋮ Modeling project preferences in multiattribute portfolio decision analysis ⋮ How well does the OWA operator represent real preferences? ⋮ Choice-based preference disaggregation concerning vehicle technologies

Uses Software

• UTA Plus
• VisualUTA

Cites Work

• Selection of a representative value function in robust multiple criteria sorting
• Ordinal regression revisited: Multiple criteria ranking using a set of additive value functions
• Learning about preferences in electronic negotiations - A volume-based measurement method
• Assessing a set of additive utility functions for multicriteria decision- making, the UTA method
• Developing sorting models using preference disaggregation analysis: an experimental investigation.
• Question selection for multi-attribute decision-aiding.
• Estimating the weights for multiple attributes in a composite criterion using pairwise judgments
• Estimation of Attribute Weights from Preference Comparisons
• The Effect of Attribute Ranges on Weights in Multiattribute Utility Measurements
• Preference disaggregation: 20 years of MCDA experience.
• Comparative analysis of UTA multicriteria methods.

This page was built for publication: Implausible alternatives in eliciting multi-attribute value functions