scientific article

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 21:48, 3 February 2024 by Import240129110113 (talk | contribs) (Created automatically from import240129110113)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Publication:3075502

zbMath1274.62025MaRDI QIDQ3075502

Deirdre McCloskey, Stephen T. Ziliak

Publication date: 15 February 2011


Title: zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.



Related Items (26)

Pitfalls of significance testing and \(p\)-value variability: an econometrics perspective\(S\)-values: conventional context-minimal measures of the sturdiness of regression coefficientsThe expected demise of the Bayes factorTheoretical and empirical distributions of the \(p\) valueGeneralisations, examples, and counter-examples in analysis and optimisation. \textit{In honour of Michel Théra at 70}Scientific self-correction: the Bayesian wayCan \(p\)-values be meaningfully interpreted without random sampling?Inferential Statistics as Descriptive Statistics: There Is No Replication Crisis if We Don’t Expect ReplicationDecision-Theoretic Hypothesis Testing: A Primer With R Package OptSigNon-Experimental Data, Hypothesis Testing, and the Likelihood Principle: A Social Science PerspectiveSignificance testing, \(p\)-values and the principle of total evidenceThe widespread misinterpretation ofp-values as error probabilitiesOutcome-wide longitudinal designs for causal inference: a new template for empirical studiesLOPSIDED REASONING ON LOPSIDED TESTS AND MULTIPLE COMPARISONSThe objectivity of subjective BayesianismBiometry and the IBS—Strength through DiversityReproducibility in Computational Science: A Case Study: Randomness of the Digits of PiPrediction scoring of data-driven discoveries for reproducible researchMoving to a World Beyond “p < 0.05”Will the ASA's Efforts to Improve Statistical Practice be Successful? Some Evidence to the ContraryCorrecting Corrupt Research: Recommendations for the Profession to Stop Misuse of p-ValuesBefore p < 0.05 to Beyond p < 0.05: Using History to Contextualize p-Values and Significance TestingValidP-Values Behave Exactly as They Should: Some Misleading Criticisms ofP-Values and Their Resolution WithS-ValuesHow Effect Size (Practical Significance) Misleads Clinical Practice: The Case for Switching to Practical Benefit to Assess Applied Research FindingsHow Large Are Your G-Values? Try Gosset’s Guinnessometrics When a Little “p” Is Not EnoughFive Nonobvious Changes in Editorial Practice for Editors and Reviewers to Consider When Evaluating Submissions in a Post p < 0.05 Universe







This page was built for publication: