A New Way to Analyze Paired Comparison Rules

DOI10.1287/MOOR.2013.0635zbMath1308.91048OpenAlexW2127709253MaRDI QIDQ5244860

Donald G. Saari

Publication date: 31 March 2015

Published in: Mathematics of Operations Research (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://semanticscholar.org/paper/c7ff43cc651957e9e7cd9d0e8b0d6a3fa5256bb5

zbMATH Keywords

paradoxesvotingpaired comparisons

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Decision theory (91B06) Voting theory (91B12) Paired and multiple comparisons; multiple testing (62J15)

Related Items (8)

Pairwise ranking: choice of method can produce arbitrarily different rank order ⋮ Transitivity measurements of fuzzy preference relations ⋮ Basis for binary comparisons and non-standard probabilities ⋮ Unifying voting theory from Nakamura's to Greenberg's theorems ⋮ Seeking consistency with paired comparisons: a systems approach ⋮ HodgeRank Is the Limit of Perron Rank ⋮ The linear algebra of pairwise comparisons ⋮ Enumerating Polytropes

Cites Work

• Mathematical structure of voting paradoxes. I: Pairwise votes
• Symmetry of Nonparametric Statistical Tests on Three Samples
• Dictionaries of Paradoxes for Statistical Tests on k Samples
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item

This page was built for publication: A New Way to Analyze Paired Comparison Rules