Poisson approximations for time-changed point processes (Q1106547)

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 11:26, 16 February 2024 by RedirectionBot (talk | contribs) (‎Removed claim: reviewed by (P1447): Item:Q587805)
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Poisson approximations for time-changed point processes
scientific article

    Statements

    Poisson approximations for time-changed point processes (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    1988
    0 references
    Let N be the point process belonging to a strictly increasing unbounded sequence of finite stopping times \(0<T_ 1<T_ 2<..\). of a filtration \({\mathcal F}=({\mathcal F}(t))_{t\geq 0}\) and denote A its ``compensator'', that is the unique \({\mathcal F}\)-predictable stochastic process with increasing paths such that \(A(0)=0\) and N-A is a local martingale, and \(\hat N\) its ``time transformed point process'', that is the point process belonging to the sequence \(0<A(T_ 1)<A(T_ 2)<\dots\) One important result on time transformed point processes states (Meyer 1971): Let \(N = (N_1, N_2, \dots, N_ k)\) be a vector of point processes. Suppose that A1) for any \(i \neq j\) the probability that \(N_ i\) and \(N_ j\) have common jumps is 0, and A2) the compensators \(A_ i\) of \(N_ i\) are continuous, then the vector \(\hat N = (\hat N_1, \hat N_2, \dots, \hat N_ k)\) of the time transformed point processes is a vector \(\Pi = (\Pi_1, \Pi_2, \dots, \Pi_ k)\) of independent unit rate Poisson processes. This statement is not true, if the two assumptions A1) and A2) do not hold. In that case, this paper provides an explicit bound for the total variation distance \(d(\hat N(t), \Pi (t))\).
    0 references
    survival models.
    0 references
    point process
    0 references
    stopping times
    0 references
    local martingale
    0 references
    time transformed point processes
    0 references
    variation distance
    0 references

    Identifiers