On complex surfaces diffeomorphic to rational surfaces (Q1842514)

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 07:32, 28 July 2023 by Importer (talk | contribs) (‎Created a new Item)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
On complex surfaces diffeomorphic to rational surfaces
scientific article

    Statements

    On complex surfaces diffeomorphic to rational surfaces (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    5 November 1995
    0 references
    The goal of the paper is to prove that a surface of general type can not be diffeomorphic to a rational surface. This is the last step in the proof of the fact that every complex surface diffeomorphic to a rational surface is a rational surface, as well as the invariance of the Kodaira dimension under diffeomorphisms for complex surfaces, which was conjectured by \textit{A. Van de Ven}. The result is obtained by using the \(\text{SO} (3)\) invariants introduced by \textit{S. K. Donaldson} [Differ. Geom. 26, 141-168 (1987; Zbl 0631.57010)]. For the only known example of a surface of general type homeomorphic to a rational surface, the Barlow surface, it was already proved by \textit{D. Kotschick} [Invent. Math. 95, No. 3, 591-600 (1989; Zbl 0691.57008)], as well as \textit{C. Okonek} and \textit{A. Van de Ven} [ibid. 601-614 (1989; Zbl 0691.57007)] that this surface is not diffeomorphic to a rational surface. The proof of the results of the paper are now much easier by using the new Seiberg Witten invariants.
    0 references
    0 references
    gauge theory
    0 references
    Van de Ven conjecture
    0 references
    a surface of general type can not be diffeomorphic to a rational surface
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references