On complex surfaces diffeomorphic to rational surfaces (Q1842514)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
On complex surfaces diffeomorphic to rational surfaces
scientific article

    Statements

    On complex surfaces diffeomorphic to rational surfaces (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    5 November 1995
    0 references
    The goal of the paper is to prove that a surface of general type can not be diffeomorphic to a rational surface. This is the last step in the proof of the fact that every complex surface diffeomorphic to a rational surface is a rational surface, as well as the invariance of the Kodaira dimension under diffeomorphisms for complex surfaces, which was conjectured by \textit{A. Van de Ven}. The result is obtained by using the \(\text{SO} (3)\) invariants introduced by \textit{S. K. Donaldson} [Differ. Geom. 26, 141-168 (1987; Zbl 0631.57010)]. For the only known example of a surface of general type homeomorphic to a rational surface, the Barlow surface, it was already proved by \textit{D. Kotschick} [Invent. Math. 95, No. 3, 591-600 (1989; Zbl 0691.57008)], as well as \textit{C. Okonek} and \textit{A. Van de Ven} [ibid. 601-614 (1989; Zbl 0691.57007)] that this surface is not diffeomorphic to a rational surface. The proof of the results of the paper are now much easier by using the new Seiberg Witten invariants.
    0 references
    gauge theory
    0 references
    Van de Ven conjecture
    0 references
    a surface of general type can not be diffeomorphic to a rational surface
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references