Effect algebras are not adequate models for quantum mechanics (Q535625)

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 00:33, 5 March 2024 by Import240304020342 (talk | contribs) (Set profile property.)
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Effect algebras are not adequate models for quantum mechanics
scientific article

    Statements

    Effect algebras are not adequate models for quantum mechanics (English)
    0 references
    13 May 2011
    0 references
    The author proves the following facts: If an effect algebra admits an order-determining set of states (= probability measures), then it is a sub-effect algebra of \([0,1]^X\) for some set~\(X\) (thus the effect algebra is representable by fuzzy sets). If an effect algebra \(E\) admits at least one state, it admits hidden variables in the sense that there is a state-preserving morphism of \(E\) to some MV-algebra. These results indicate that effect algebras are not appropriate models of quantum mechanical systems. As an alternative, the author suggested sequential effect algebras in [\textit{S. Gudder} and \textit{R. Greechie}, Rep. Math. Phys. 49, No. 1, 87--111 (2002; Zbl 1023.81001)]. These structures, equipped with an additional operation, the \textit{sequential product}, and with a modified definition of a dispersion-free state, admit to overcome the above inadequacies. It is shown that a sequential effect algebra admits an order-determining set of dispersion-free states iff it is a sub-effect algebra of \([0,1]^X\).
    0 references
    0 references
    effect algebra
    0 references
    sequential product
    0 references
    quantum mechanics
    0 references
    hidden variable
    0 references
    state
    0 references
    probability measure
    0 references
    dispersion-free state
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers