On the modal definability of simulability by finite transitive models (Q763328)

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 23:17, 4 July 2024 by ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) (‎Changed an Item)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
On the modal definability of simulability by finite transitive models
scientific article

    Statements

    On the modal definability of simulability by finite transitive models (English)
    0 references
    9 March 2012
    0 references
    Given a finite, transitive and reflexive Kripke model \(\langle W, \preccurlyeq, [ \mkern-3mu [ \cdot ] \mkern-3mu ] \rangle\) and \(w \in W\), it is shown that the property ``being simulated by \(w\)'' (i.e. lying on the image of a literal-preserving relation satisfying the ``forth'' condition of bisimulation) is modally undefinable within the class of \({\mathsf S4}\) Kripke models (contrary to \({\mathsf K4}\), which is also proved). A minor extension of the language by adding a sequent operator \(\natural\) (``tangle'') which can be interpreted over Kripke models as well as over topological spaces is proposed. In the extended language \({\mathsf L}^+ = {\mathsf L}^{\square \natural}\), being simulated by a point on a finite transitive Kripke model becomes definable, both over the class of arbitrary Kripke models and over the class of topological \({\mathsf S4}\) models. As a consequence it is obtained that any class of finite, transitive models over finitely many propositional variables closed under simulability is also definable in \({\mathsf L}^+\), as well as Boolean combinations of these classes. From this it follows that the \(\mu\)-calculus interpreted over any such class of models is decidable.
    0 references
    0 references
    modal logic
    0 references
    bisimulation
    0 references
    decidability, mu-calculus
    0 references
    Kripke model
    0 references
    simulation
    0 references

    Identifiers