Auctioning the right to play ultimatum games and the impact on equilibrium selection (Q2351256)

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 07:37, 10 July 2024 by ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) (‎Changed an Item)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Auctioning the right to play ultimatum games and the impact on equilibrium selection
scientific article

    Statements

    Auctioning the right to play ultimatum games and the impact on equilibrium selection (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    23 June 2015
    0 references
    Summary: We auction scarce rights to play the Proposer and Responder positions in ultimatum games. As a control treatment, we randomly allocate these rights and charge exogenous participation fees. These participation fee sequences match the auction price sequence from a session of the original treatment. With endogenous selection via auctions, we find that play converges to a session-specific Nash equilibrium, and auction prices emerge supporting this equilibrium by the principle of forward induction. With random assignment, we find play also converges to a session-specific Nash equilibrium as predicted by the principle of loss avoidance. While Nash equilibria with low offers are observed, the subgame perfect Nash equilibrium never is.
    0 references
    ultimatum bargaining
    0 references
    auction
    0 references
    forward induction
    0 references
    loss avoidance
    0 references

    Identifiers