A Group Preference Axiomatization with Cardinal Utility
From MaRDI portal
Cited in
(35)- A hierarchical interactive method for ranking alternatives with multiple qualitative criteria
- Interactive decision aiding for group decision support
- Consensus of opinion
- Aggregation of preferences: a review
- Arrow's theorem is not a surprising result
- Multiattribute utility theory: A survey
- Collective judgement: combining individual value judgements
- Group preference aggregation methods employed in AHP: An evaluation and an intrinsic process for deriving members' weightages
- Range-based multi-actor multi-criteria analysis: a combined method of multi-actor multi-criteria analysis and Monte Carlo simulation to support participatory decision making under uncertainty
- Geometry of decision making and the vector space formulation of the analytic hierarchy process
- A flexible framework for group decision support: WINGDSS version 3.0
- Consensus mechanism with maximum-return modifications and minimum-cost feedback: a perspective of game theory
- Group decision making using bilateral agreement matrix
- Trade-off sensitive experimental design: a multicriterion, decision theoretic, Bayes linear ap\-proach
- Foundations for group decision analysis
- A note on a group preference axiomatization with cardinal utility
- Approaches to multi-stage multi-attribute group decision making
- Aggregation of ordinal and cardinal preferences: a framework based on distance functions
- Levels of incomplete information in group decision models -- a comprehensive simulation study
- The precise consistency consensus matrix in a local AHP-group decision making context
- A METHOD BASED ON THE DYNAMIC WEIGHTED GEOMETRIC AGGREGATION OPERATOR FOR DYNAMIC HYBRID MULTI-ATTRIBUTE GROUP DECISION MAKING
- Multi-period multi-attribute group decision-making under linguistic assessments
- The possibility of group choice: pairwise comparisons and merging functions
- Bayesian modeling of health state preferences
- A method for group decision-making based on determining weights of decision makers using TOPSIS
- Preference–Approval Structures in Group Decision Making: Axiomatic Distance and Aggregation
- Group decision making with incomplete information: a dominance and quasi‐optimality volume‐based approach using Monte‐Carlo simulation
- Cross-domain decision making with parameter transfer based on value function
- An axiomatic distance methodology for aggregating multimodal evaluations
- Aggregating predictions from experts: a review of statistical methods, experiments, and applications
- Preference-sorting structures extending scores and ordered categories: an axiomatic distance approach in group decision making
- Approach to group decision making based on determining the weights of experts by using projection method
- Developing a straightforward approach for group decision making based on determining weights of decision makers
- Interactive multiple objective optimization: Survey. I: Continuous case
- An interactive method for fuzzy multiple attribute group decision making
This page was built for publication: A Group Preference Axiomatization with Cardinal Utility
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4121638)
