A ranked voting system using a DEA/AR exclusion model: A note
From MaRDI portal
Recommendations
- A method for discriminating efficient candidates with ranked voting data.
- A ranked voting system for consolidation of different results of ranking methods in DEA
- A selection method for a preferential election
- Two effective total ranking models for preference voting and aggregation
- Preference aggregation and DEA: an analysis of the methods proposed to discriminate efficient candidates
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 920120 (Why is no real title available?)
- A DEA SELECTION SYSTEM FOR SELECTIVE EXAMINATIONS
- A Data Envelopment Model for Aggregating Preference Rankings
- A Procedure for Ranking Efficient Units in Data Envelopment Analysis
- A stochastic dominance analysis of ranked voting systems with scoring
- Measuring the efficiency of decision making units
- Preference voting and project ranking using DEA and cross-evaluation
- Prioritization models for frontier decision making units in DEA
Cited in
(35)- Robust winner determination in positional scoring rules with uncertain weights
- A selection method for a preferential election
- A new approach for ranking of candidates in voting systems
- Ranking decision making units: the cross-efficiency evaluation
- A modified DEA cross efficiency method with negative data and its application in supplier selection
- Discriminating DEA efficient candidates by considering their least relative total scores
- A project portfolio selection problem in a group decision-making context
- An integrated approach for resource allocation in manufacturing plants
- Aggregating preference rankings using OWA operator weights
- Ranking efficient dmus using the Tchebycheff norm
- A DEA- COMPROMISE PROGRAMMING MODEL FOR COMPREHENSIVE RANKING
- New approaches for determining a common set of weights for a voting system
- Volume‐based ranking method for a ranked voting system
- A method for discriminating efficient candidates with ranked voting data.
- A solution method to the problem proposed by Wang in voting systems
- Trajectories of efficiency measurement: a bibliometric analysis of DEA and SFA
- An integrated data envelopment analysis and simulation method for group consensus ranking
- Two effective total ranking models for preference voting and aggregation
- Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context
- An improved method for ranking alternatives in multiple criteria decision analysis
- Cross-ranking of decision making units in data envelopment analysis
- Ranking of petrochemical companies using preferential voting at unequal levels of voting power through data envelopment analysis
- A stochastic dominance analysis of ranked voting systems with scoring
- A novel approach for discriminating efficient candidates by classifying voters in the preferential voting framework
- Suitability and redundancy of non-homogeneous weight restrictions for measuring the relative efficiency in DEA.
- A review of ranking models in data envelopment analysis
- An alternative approach to monetary aggregation in DEA
- Aggregating preferences rankings with variable weights
- Preference aggregation and DEA: an analysis of the methods proposed to discriminate efficient candidates
- A ranked voting system for consolidation of different results of ranking methods in DEA
- Strategic development for the Department of Information Management of Shih Chien University Kaohsiung campus in Taiwan by a quantifiable SWOT analysis
- PREFERENCE VOTING AND RANKING USING DEA GAME CROSS EFFICIENCY MODEL(<Special Issue>Operations Research for Performance Evaluation)
- Crowding distance development for ranking efficient units in DEA
- Analytical hierarchy process: revolution and evolution
- A comparative study on performance measurement of decision-making units: a case study in iranian Tejarat banks
This page was built for publication: A ranked voting system using a DEA/AR exclusion model: A note
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1278664)
