Aggregating preferences rankings with variable weights
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2355952
DOI10.1016/J.EJOR.2013.04.013zbMATH Open1317.91026DBLPjournals/eor/LlamazaresP13OpenAlexW2071876557WikidataQ58341339 ScholiaQ58341339MaRDI QIDQ2355952FDOQ2355952
Authors: Bonifacio Llamazares, Teresa Peña 
Publication date: 28 July 2015
Published in: European Journal of Operational Research (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: http://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/36228
Recommendations
- Three new models for preference voting and aggregation
- Aggregating preference rankings using OWA operator weights
- Two effective total ranking models for preference voting and aggregation
- A Data Envelopment Model for Aggregating Preference Rankings
- Preference aggregation and DEA: an analysis of the methods proposed to discriminate efficient candidates
Cites Work
- A Procedure for Ranking Efficient Units in Data Envelopment Analysis
- Preference voting and project ranking using DEA and cross-evaluation
- A ranked voting system using a DEA/AR exclusion model: A note
- A method for discriminating efficient candidates with ranked voting data.
- A Data Envelopment Model for Aggregating Preference Rankings
- The appropriate total ranking method using DEA for multiple categorized purposes
- A solution method to the problem proposed by Wang in voting systems
- A stochastic dominance analysis of ranked voting systems with scoring
- Preference aggregation and DEA: an analysis of the methods proposed to discriminate efficient candidates
- Discriminating DEA efficient candidates by considering their least relative total scores
- An improved method for ranking alternatives in multiple criteria decision analysis
- Three new models for preference voting and aggregation
- Aggregating preference rankings using OWA operator weights
- PREFERENCE VOTING AND RANKING USING DEA GAME CROSS EFFICIENCY MODEL(<Special Issue>Operations Research for Performance Evaluation)
- A selection method for a preferential election
- A new approach for ranking of candidates in voting systems
- A note on ``A solution method to the problem proposed by Wang in voting systems
- A DEA- COMPROMISE PROGRAMMING MODEL FOR COMPREHENSIVE RANKING
- New approaches for determining a common set of weights for a voting system
- Application of prioritized aggregation operators in preference voting
Cited In (12)
- Robust winner determination in positional scoring rules with uncertain weights
- Aggregating preference rankings: An AHP‐based approach
- Aggregating preference rankings using OWA operator weights
- A class of flexible weight indices for ranking alternatives
- An equilibrium efficiency frontier data envelopment analysis approach for evaluating decision-making units with fixed-sum outputs
- Volume‐based ranking method for a ranked voting system
- Weighted distances between preferences
- The other side of ranking schemes: generating weights for specified outcomes
- Scoring rules and social choice properties: some characterizations
- Preference modeling experiments with surrogate weighting procedures for the PROMETHEE method
- Simultaneous elicitation of scoring rule and agent preferences for robust winner determination
- Pointwise aggregation of maps: its structural functional equation and some applications to social choice theory
This page was built for publication: Aggregating preferences rankings with variable weights
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2355952)
