A method for discriminating efficient candidates with ranked voting data.

From MaRDI portal
Publication:1406971

DOI10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00597-0zbMath1033.90054OpenAlexW2016459394MaRDI QIDQ1406971

Hiroaki Ishii, Tsuneshi Obata

Publication date: 7 September 2003

Published in: European Journal of Operational Research (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0377-2217(02)00597-0




Related Items (27)

An integrated approach for resource allocation in manufacturing plantsDiscriminating DEA efficient candidates by considering their least relative total scoresAggregating preference rankings using OWA operator weightsAchievable hierarchies in voting games with abstentionCommon set of weights in data envelopment analysis: a linear programming problemTrajectories of efficiency measurement: a bibliometric analysis of DEA and SFACost efficiency analysis with ordinal data: a theoretical and computational viewAn improved method for ranking alternatives in multiple criteria decision analysisA review of ranking models in data envelopment analysisRanking of petrochemical companies using preferential voting at unequal levels of voting power through data envelopment analysisVolume‐based ranking method for a ranked voting systemA new approach for ranking of candidates in voting systemsProperties of ladder tournamentsAnalytical hierarchy process: revolution and evolutionOn the ordinal equivalence of the Johnston, Banzhaf and Shapley power indicesAn integrated data envelopment analysis and simulation method for group consensus rankingRanking of units on the DEA frontier with common weightsA novel approach for discriminating efficient candidates by classifying voters in the preferential voting frameworkPower in voting rules with abstention: an axiomatization of a two components power indexData envelopment analysis with common weights: the weight restriction approachA selection method for a preferential electionApplication of prioritized aggregation operators in preference votingTwo effective total ranking models for preference voting and aggregationPreference aggregation and DEA: an analysis of the methods proposed to discriminate efficient candidatesStrategic development for the Department of Information Management of Shih Chien University Kaohsiung campus in Taiwan by a quantifiable SWOT analysisNew approaches for determining a common set of weights for a voting systemAggregating preferences rankings with variable weights



Cites Work


This page was built for publication: A method for discriminating efficient candidates with ranked voting data.