A method for discriminating efficient candidates with ranked voting data.
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1406971
DOI10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00597-0zbMath1033.90054OpenAlexW2016459394MaRDI QIDQ1406971
Publication date: 7 September 2003
Published in: European Journal of Operational Research (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0377-2217(02)00597-0
Related Items (27)
An integrated approach for resource allocation in manufacturing plants ⋮ Discriminating DEA efficient candidates by considering their least relative total scores ⋮ Aggregating preference rankings using OWA operator weights ⋮ Achievable hierarchies in voting games with abstention ⋮ Common set of weights in data envelopment analysis: a linear programming problem ⋮ Trajectories of efficiency measurement: a bibliometric analysis of DEA and SFA ⋮ Cost efficiency analysis with ordinal data: a theoretical and computational view ⋮ An improved method for ranking alternatives in multiple criteria decision analysis ⋮ A review of ranking models in data envelopment analysis ⋮ Ranking of petrochemical companies using preferential voting at unequal levels of voting power through data envelopment analysis ⋮ Volume‐based ranking method for a ranked voting system ⋮ A new approach for ranking of candidates in voting systems ⋮ Properties of ladder tournaments ⋮ Analytical hierarchy process: revolution and evolution ⋮ On the ordinal equivalence of the Johnston, Banzhaf and Shapley power indices ⋮ An integrated data envelopment analysis and simulation method for group consensus ranking ⋮ Ranking of units on the DEA frontier with common weights ⋮ A novel approach for discriminating efficient candidates by classifying voters in the preferential voting framework ⋮ Power in voting rules with abstention: an axiomatization of a two components power index ⋮ Data envelopment analysis with common weights: the weight restriction approach ⋮ A selection method for a preferential election ⋮ Application of prioritized aggregation operators in preference voting ⋮ Two effective total ranking models for preference voting and aggregation ⋮ Preference aggregation and DEA: an analysis of the methods proposed to discriminate efficient candidates ⋮ Strategic development for the Department of Information Management of Shih Chien University Kaohsiung campus in Taiwan by a quantifiable SWOT analysis ⋮ New approaches for determining a common set of weights for a voting system ⋮ Aggregating preferences rankings with variable weights
Cites Work
- Measuring the efficiency of decision making units
- Preference voting and project ranking using DEA and cross-evaluation
- A ranked voting system using a DEA/AR exclusion model: A note
- A Data Envelopment Model for Aggregating Preference Rankings
- A Procedure for Ranking Efficient Units in Data Envelopment Analysis
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
This page was built for publication: A method for discriminating efficient candidates with ranked voting data.