Abstraction reconceived

DOI10.1093/BJPS/AXU035MaRDI QIDQ2965440zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors J. P. Studd

Publication date 3 March 2017

Published in The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axu035

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05)

Recommendations

• Bad company tamed
• Bad company and neo-Fregean philosophy
• Introduction to the special issue on the bad company problem
• Abstraction and four kinds of invariance (or: what's so logical about counting)
• Bad company generalized

Cited in

(20)

• Bad company tamed
• Bad company generalized
• Introduction to the special issue on the bad company problem
• Cardinality and acceptable abstraction
• Term models for abstraction principles
• Kit Fine on \textsl{The limits of abstraction}
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5288074 (Why is no real title available?)
• Abstraction and Additional Nature
• Abstract Radices
• What Russell should have said to Burali-Forti
• Introduction to special issue: Abstraction principles
• Abstract blowing down
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1426542 (Why is no real title available?)
• Putnam on mathematics as modal logic
• What Is Wrong with Abstraction?†
• FOR BETTER AND FOR WORSE. ABSTRACTIONISM, GOOD COMPANY, AND PLURALISM
• THE POTENTIAL IN FREGE’S THEOREM
• Grounding and auto-abstraction
• TWO-SORTED FREGE ARITHMETIC IS NOT CONSERVATIVE
• Refining abstract interpretations

This page was built for publication: Abstraction reconceived

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2965440)