What Russell should have said to Burali-Forti
From MaRDI portal
Publication:4600824
Recommendations
Cites work
- Grundlagen, Section 64: Frege's Discussion of Definitions by Abstraction in Historical Context
- A generic Russellian elimination of abstract objects
- Abstraction reconceived
- Amending Frege's \textit{Grundgesetze der Arithmetik}
- Burali-Forti's paradox: A reappraisal of its origins
- FRAGMENTS OF FREGE’SGRUNDGESETZEAND GÖDEL’S CONSTRUCTIBLE UNIVERSE
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1550338 (Why is no real title available?)
- Is Hume's principle analytic?
- Iteration one more time
- Labyrinth of thought. A history of set theory and its role in modern mathematics.
- Mathematics and Bleak House
- New V, ZF and Abstraction†
- On the consistency of the \(\Delta_1^1\)-CA fragment of Frege's Grundgesetze
- On the significance of the Burali-Forti paradox
- Plural Quantification and Classes†
- Predicative Fragments of Frege Arithmetic
- RELATIVE CATEGORICITY AND ABSTRACTION PRINCIPLES
- Sets and Classes
- Subsystems of second order arithmetic
- The Consistency of predicative fragments of frege’s grundgesetze der arithmetik
- The liar paradox
Cited in
(7)
This page was built for publication: What Russell should have said to Burali-Forti
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4600824)