WHAT RUSSELL SHOULD HAVE SAID TO BURALI–FORTI
From MaRDI portal
Publication:4600824
DOI10.1017/S1755020316000484zbMath1417.03064MaRDI QIDQ4600824
Salvatore Florio, Graham Leach-Krouse
Publication date: 17 January 2018
Published in: The Review of Symbolic Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)
Philosophy of mathematics (00A30) Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Ordinal and cardinal numbers (03E10)
Related Items (2)
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Iteration one more time
- Amending Frege's \textit{Grundgesetze der Arithmetik}
- Burali-Forti's paradox: A reappraisal of its origins
- The liar paradox
- On the consistency of the \(\Delta_1^1\)-CA fragment of Frege's Grundgesetze
- Grundlagen, Section 64: Frege's Discussion of Definitions by Abstraction in Historical Context
- Abstraction Reconceived
- FRAGMENTS OF FREGE’SGRUNDGESETZEAND GÖDEL’S CONSTRUCTIBLE UNIVERSE
- RELATIVE CATEGORICITY AND ABSTRACTION PRINCIPLES
- The Consistency of predicative fragments of frege’s grundgesetze der arithmetik
- A Generic Russellian Elimination of Abstract Objects: Fig. 1.
- On the significance of the Burali-Forti paradox
- Mathematics and Bleak House
- Predicative Fragments of Frege Arithmetic
- Plural Quantification and Classes†
- New V, ZF and Abstraction†
- Sets and Classes
- Is Hume's principle analytic?
This page was built for publication: WHAT RUSSELL SHOULD HAVE SAID TO BURALI–FORTI