WHAT RUSSELL SHOULD HAVE SAID TO BURALI–FORTI

DOI10.1017/S1755020316000484zbMath1417.03064MaRDI QIDQ4600824

Salvatore Florio, Graham Leach-Krouse

Publication date: 17 January 2018

Published in: The Review of Symbolic Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

zbMATH Keywords

paradoxhigher-order logicRusselllogicismabstractionordinalsBurali-Fortino class theory

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophy of mathematics (00A30) Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Ordinal and cardinal numbers (03E10)

Related Items (2)

BOLZANO’S MATHEMATICAL INFINITE ⋮ Coalgebra and abstraction

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Iteration one more time
• Amending Frege's \textit{Grundgesetze der Arithmetik}
• Burali-Forti's paradox: A reappraisal of its origins
• The liar paradox
• On the consistency of the \(\Delta_1^1\)-CA fragment of Frege's Grundgesetze
• Grundlagen, Section 64: Frege's Discussion of Definitions by Abstraction in Historical Context
• Abstraction Reconceived
• FRAGMENTS OF FREGE’SGRUNDGESETZEAND GÖDEL’S CONSTRUCTIBLE UNIVERSE
• RELATIVE CATEGORICITY AND ABSTRACTION PRINCIPLES
• The Consistency of predicative fragments of frege’s grundgesetze der arithmetik
• A Generic Russellian Elimination of Abstract Objects: Fig. 1.
• On the significance of the Burali-Forti paradox
• Mathematics and Bleak House
• Predicative Fragments of Frege Arithmetic
• Plural Quantification and Classes†
• New V, ZF and Abstraction†
• Sets and Classes
• Is Hume's principle analytic?

This page was built for publication: WHAT RUSSELL SHOULD HAVE SAID TO BURALI–FORTI