Is Hume's principle analytic?
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5937843
DOI10.1305/ndjfl/1039096303zbMath0968.03009OpenAlexW1966615173MaRDI QIDQ5937843
Publication date: 17 July 2001
Published in: Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1305/ndjfl/1039096303
arithmeticanalyticityBoolosDedekind-Peano postulateFrege's theoremHume's principleneologicistproblem of Bad Companysecond-order logic
Philosophy of mathematics (00A30) Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) First-order arithmetic and fragments (03F30) History of mathematical logic and foundations (03-03)
Related Items (21)
FOR BETTER AND FOR WORSE. ABSTRACTIONISM, GOOD COMPANY, AND PLURALISM ⋮ RELATIVE CATEGORICITY AND ABSTRACTION PRINCIPLES ⋮ LOGICISM, INTERPRETABILITY, AND KNOWLEDGE OF ARITHMETIC ⋮ Grounding and auto-abstraction ⋮ WHAT RUSSELL SHOULD HAVE SAID TO BURALI–FORTI ⋮ The enhanced indispensability argument, the circularity problem, and the interpretability strategy ⋮ Comparing Peano arithmetic, Basic Law V, and Hume's Principle ⋮ Frege's other program ⋮ Neo-Fregeanism: an embarrassment of riches ⋮ Hume's Principle and Axiom V reconsidered: Critical reflections on Frege and his interpreters ⋮ Bad company objection to Joongol Kim's adverbial theory of numbers ⋮ Bad company and neo-Fregean philosophy ⋮ Hume's big brother: Counting concepts and the bad company objection ⋮ Bad company tamed ⋮ Introduction to the special issue on the bad company problem ⋮ Rescuing implicit definition from abstractionism ⋮ On the origin and status of our conception of number ⋮ Realism and paradox ⋮ Frege meets Dedekind: A neologicist treatment of real analysis ⋮ Abstraction and set theory ⋮ DEDUCTIVE CARDINALITY RESULTS AND NUISANCE-LIKE PRINCIPLES
Cites Work
This page was built for publication: Is Hume's principle analytic?