Neo-Fregeanism: an embarrassment of riches

DOI10.1305/NDJFL/1082637613zbMATH Open1071.03006OpenAlexW1971020770MaRDI QIDQ558727FDOQ558727

Authors: Alan Weir 

Publication date: 13 July 2005

Published in: Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1305/ndjfl/1082637613

Recommendations

• Which Abstraction Principles are Acceptable? Some Limitative Results
• Bad company tamed
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2107940
• Double vision: two questions about the neo-Fregean program
• Bad company and neo-Fregean philosophy

zbMATH Keywords

abstractionFregeneologicism

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Nonclassical and second-order set theories (03E70) Other set-theoretic hypotheses and axioms (03E65)

Cites Work

• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• The Consistency of predicative fragments of frege’s grundgesetze der arithmetik
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• On the consistency of the first-order portion of Frege's logical system
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Beyond first-order logic: the historical interplay between mathematical logic and axiomatic set theory
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Is Hume's principle analytic?
• Naïve set theory, paraconsistency and indeterminacy. I
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• New V, ZF and Abstraction†
• Finitude and Hume's principle
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Classical harmony
• Reals by abstraction
• ``Neo-logicist logic is not epistemically innocent
• Dummett on impredicativity
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• On the necessary existence of numbers
• The Definability of Cardinal Numbers
• Title not available (Why is that?)

Cited In (18)

• Double vision: two questions about the neo-Fregean program
• Focus restored: Comments on John MacFarlane
• The good, the bad and the ugly
• FOR BETTER AND FOR WORSE. ABSTRACTIONISM, GOOD COMPANY, AND PLURALISM
• HUME’S PRINCIPLE, BAD COMPANY, AND THE AXIOM OF CHOICE
• TWO-SORTED FREGE ARITHMETIC IS NOT CONSERVATIVE
• Speaking with Shadows: A Study of Neo‐Logicism
• Introduction to the special issue on the bad company problem
• Iteration one more time
• Number theory and infinity without mathematics
• Bad company and neo-Fregean philosophy
• Bad company generalized
• Hume's big brother: Counting concepts and the bad company objection
• Bad company objection to Joongol Kim's adverbial theory of numbers
• The neo-Carnapians
• What is Neologicism?
• Cardinality and acceptable abstraction
• Deductive cardinality results and nuisance-like principles

This page was built for publication: Neo-Fregeanism: an embarrassment of riches

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q558727)