Speaking with Shadows: A Study of Neo‐Logicism
From MaRDI portal
Publication:4459682
Recommendations
- Neo-Logicism and Its Logic
- Debating (neo)logicism: Frege and the neo-Fregeans
- Russell and the Neo-Logicists
- Shadows of Syntax
- Frege and neologicism
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3959383
- Taking stock: Hale, Heck, and Wright on neo-logicism and higher-order logic
- Paraconsistency and dialogue logic critical examination and further explorations
- Neo-Fregeanism: an embarrassment of riches
Cited in
(20)- What is the purpose of neo-logicism?
- Towards a pluralist theory of singular thought
- The functional composition of sense
- TWO-SORTED FREGE ARITHMETIC IS NOT CONSERVATIVE
- Bad company and neo-Fregean philosophy
- Bad company objection to Joongol Kim's adverbial theory of numbers
- Neo-Logicism and Its Logic
- Rescuing implicit definition from abstractionism
- Frege, Dedekind, and the origins of logicism
- Coalgebra and abstraction
- The State of the Economy: Neo-logicism and Inflationt
- Abstractionist categories of categories
- Taking stock: Hale, Heck, and Wright on neo-logicism and higher-order logic
- Comparing Peano arithmetic, Basic Law V, and Hume's Principle
- Singular terms revisited
- The status of value-ranges in the argument of \textit{Basic laws of arithmetic} I {\S}10
- What is Neologicism?
- Hale's argument from transitive counting
- Hume's principle: a plea for austerity
- In good company? On Hume's principle and the assignment of numbers to infinite concepts
This page was built for publication: Speaking with Shadows: A Study of Neo‐Logicism
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4459682)
