RELATIVE CATEGORICITY AND ABSTRACTION PRINCIPLES
From MaRDI portal
Publication:3195592
DOI10.1017/S1755020315000052zbMath1337.03012arXiv1409.3483MaRDI QIDQ3195592
Sean C. Ebels-Duggan, Sean Walsh
Publication date: 20 October 2015
Published in: The Review of Symbolic Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1409.3483
Related Items (3)
Identity and the cognitive value of logical equations in Frege's foundational project ⋮ WHAT RUSSELL SHOULD HAVE SAID TO BURALI–FORTI ⋮ Asymptotic Quasi-completeness and ZFC
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Comparing Peano arithmetic, Basic Law V, and Hume's Principle
- Well- and non-well-founded Fregean extensions
- Numerical abstraction via the Frege quantifier
- Where do the natural numbers come from?
- LOGICISM, INTERPRETABILITY, AND KNOWLEDGE OF ARITHMETIC
- Conservativeness, Stability, and Abstraction
- Notions of Invariance for Abstraction Principles
- What are logical notions?
- Where do sets come from?
- Model Theory
- New V, ZF and Abstraction†
- On The Consistency of Second-Order Contextual Definitions
- Is Hume's principle analytic?
This page was built for publication: RELATIVE CATEGORICITY AND ABSTRACTION PRINCIPLES