Aggregation of Attack Relations: A Social-Choice Theoretical Analysis of Defeasibility Criteria
From MaRDI portal
Recommendations
- From individual to collective argumentation: aggregating acyclic argumentation frameworks
- Social Argument Justification: Some Mechanisms and Conditions for Their Coincidence
- Aggregating alternative extensions of abstract argumentation frameworks: preservation results for quota rules
- Argumentative aggregation of individual opinions
- Judgement aggregation in multi-agent argumentation
Cited in
(18)- Revenge or continued attack and defense in defender-attacker conflicts
- Preservation of semantic properties in collective argumentation: the case of aggregating abstract argumentation frameworks
- Collective argumentation with topological restrictions
- A multi attack argumentation framework
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7444848 (Why is no real title available?)
- Social Argument Justification: Some Mechanisms and Conditions for Their Coincidence
- Theory of disjunctive attacks, Part I
- Social choice methods for database aggregation
- From individual to collective argumentation: aggregating acyclic argumentation frameworks
- Graph aggregation
- On the Expressive Power of Collective Attacks
- Extending social abstract argumentation with votes on attacks
- Weighted argument systems: basic definitions, algorithms, and complexity results
- Dynamic collective argumentation: constructing the revision and contraction operators
- Collective argumentation: the case of aggregating support-relations of bipolar argumentation frameworks
- Verification in incomplete argumentation frameworks
- Knowledge representation, scientific argumentation and non-monotonic logic
- The research on the multi-agent argumentation semantics
This page was built for publication: Aggregation of Attack Relations: A Social-Choice Theoretical Analysis of Defeasibility Criteria
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5445290)
