Collective argumentation: the case of aggregating support-relations of bipolar argumentation frameworks
From MaRDI portal
Recommendations
- From individual to collective argumentation: aggregating acyclic argumentation frameworks
- Preservation of semantic properties in collective argumentation: the case of aggregating abstract argumentation frameworks
- Aggregating alternative extensions of abstract argumentation frameworks: preservation results for quota rules
- Social Argument Justification: Some Mechanisms and Conditions for Their Coincidence
- On the aggregation of argumentation frameworks: operators and postulates
Cites work
- Aggregation of Attack Relations: A Social-Choice Theoretical Analysis of Defeasibility Criteria
- Bipolarity in argumentation graphs: towards a better understanding
- Capturing bipolar argumentation in non-flat assumption-based argumentation
- Graph aggregation
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3829582 (Why is no real title available?)
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games
- On the merging of Dung's argumentation systems
- Preservation of semantic properties in collective argumentation: the case of aggregating abstract argumentation frameworks
- Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
- Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
- The structure of strategy-proof social choice. I: General characterization and possibility results on median spaces
This page was built for publication: Collective argumentation: the case of aggregating support-relations of bipolar argumentation frameworks
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6642568)
