Avoidance of split overlaps
A \(t\)-overlap is a finite word of the form \(xxx'\), where \(|x'|=t\) and the word \(x\) starts with \(x'\). Here \(1\)-overlaps are just usual overlaps studied since Thue's papers from the beginning of the 20th century. A split occurrence of a repetition is a word of the form \(xyz\), where \(xz\) forms the repetition; so, for example, the word \texttt{contentment} contains the factor \texttt{ntentment} which is a split occurrence of the \(2\)-overlap \texttt{ntentent}. As Ochem remarked (the proof of this statement is given in the paper for the sake of completeness), there are no infinite words over a finite alphabet which would avoid split overlaps. So, the main results of this paper are upper and lower bounds for the length of the longest word over a \(k\)-letter alphabet which avoids split \(t\)-overlaps.
- A note on bifix-free sequences (Corresp.)
- A proof of Dejean’s conjecture
- A Successor Rule Framework for Constructing $k$ -Ary de Bruijn Sequences and Universal Cycles
- Context-free languages and primitive words
- Finiteness and iteration conditions for semigroups
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3505007 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3095523 (Why is no real title available?)
- Last cases of Dejean's conjecture
- Repetition avoidance in circular factors
- Sur un théorème de Thue
- The equation \(a_ M=b^ Nc^ P\) in a free group
- Uniqueness Theorems for Periodic Functions
This page was built for publication: Avoidance of split overlaps
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2214038)