Axiomatising Finite Concurrent Processes
From MaRDI portal
Recommendations
Cited in
(39)- A proof-theoretic characterization of observational equivalence
- Determinacy \(\to\) (observation equivalence \(=\) trace equivalence)
- \(\tau\)-bisimulations and full abstraction for refinement of actions
- Observational structures and their logic
- A complete axiomatisation for observational congruence of finite-state behaviours
- A theory of processes with localities
- The difference between splitting in \(n\) and \(n+1\)
- CCS with Hennessy's merge has no finite-equational axiomatization
- Timing and causality in process algebra
- Determinism \(\to\) (event structure isomorphism \(=\) step sequence equivalence)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3858386 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3872691 (Why is no real title available?)
- Twenty Years on: Reflections on the CEDISYS Project. Combining True Concurrency with Process Algebra
- Is Observational Congruence Axiomatisable in Equational Horn Logic?
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4104372 (Why is no real title available?)
- Foundational aspects of multiscale modeling of biological systems with process algebras
- On “Axiomatising Finite Concurrent Processes”
- Boundedness analysis of finitely recursive processes. I. Concurrent processes
- The limit of \(\operatorname{split}_n\)-language equivalence
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 10090 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4119607 (Why is no real title available?)
- Axiomatizing Petri net concatenable processes
- Are Two Binary Operators Necessary to Obtain a Finite Axiomatisation of Parallel Composition?
- The quest for equational axiomatizations of parallel composition: status and open problems
- Computational and Information Science
- Theoretical Aspects of Computing - ICTAC 2004
- Concurrency cannot be observed, asynchronously
- Termination, deadlock and divergence
- Axiomatising real-timed processes
- A fully abstract denotational model for observational precongruence
- On the semantics of durational actions
- On relating concurrency and nondeterminism
- A fully abstract denotational model for observational precongruence
- Are two binary operators necessary to finitely axiomatise parallel composition?
- Observing localities
- Refinement of actions in event structures and causal trees
- Non finite axiomatisability of weak bisimulation-based congruences
- Axiomatising weak bisimulation congruences over CCS with left merge and communication merge
- Bisimilarity is not finitely based over BPA with interrupt
This page was built for publication: Axiomatising Finite Concurrent Processes
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3817589)