Bayesian modelling of dependence between experts: some comparisons with Cooke's classical model
From MaRDI portal
Recommendations
Cites work
- A Bayesian method for calibration and aggregation of expert judgement
- Aggregating expert judgement
- Combining expert opinions in prior elicitation
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3514748 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3514749 (Why is no real title available?)
- Statistical Methods for Eliciting Probability Distributions
- Uncertain Judgements: Eliciting Experts' Probabilities
- Updating of Belief in the Light of Someone Else's Opinion
Cited in
(6)- Are performance weights beneficial? Investigating the random expert hypothesis
- The classical model: the early years
- Reminiscences of a classical model expert elicitation facilitator
- A Bayesian method for calibration and aggregation of expert judgement
- Bayesian Poisson Models for the Graphical Combination of Dependent Expert Information
- An in-depth perspective on the classical model
This page was built for publication: Bayesian modelling of dependence between experts: some comparisons with Cooke's classical model
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2086349)