Behavioral and procedural consequences of structural variation in value trees
From MaRDI portal
Recommendations
Cites work
- Comparison of Weighting Judgments in Multiattribute Utility Measurement
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1089212 (Why is no real title available?)
- On the convergence of multiattribute weighting methods.
- Preference Assessment by Imprecise Ratio Statements
- The Effect of Attribute Ranges on Weights in Multiattribute Utility Measurements
- There Is Hope In Attribute Weighting
Cited in
(9)- Structuring resource allocation decisions: a framework for building multi-criteria portfolio models with area-grouped options
- Methods to inform the development of concise objectives hierarchies in multi-criteria decision analysis
- Taking stock of behavioural OR: a review of behavioural studies with an intervention focus
- Using PROMETHEE to assess bioenergy pathways
- Model-based organizational decision making: a behavioral lens
- Path dependence and biases in the even swaps decision analysis method
- Effects of imprecise weighting in hierarchical preference programming
- Analyzing anchoring bias in attribute weight elicitation of SMART, Swing, and best‐worst method
- Facilitated modelling in operational research
This page was built for publication: Behavioral and procedural consequences of structural variation in value trees
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5945210)