Blending Bayesian and Classical Tools to Define Optimal Sample-Size-Dependent Significance Levels
From MaRDI portal
Cites work
- A comment on D. V. Lindley's statistical paradox
- A new proof of the likelihood principle
- A STATISTICAL PARADOX
- Adaptative significance levels using optimal decision rules: balancing by weighting the error probabilities
- Bayes Factors
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4005313 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 722351 (Why is no real title available?)
- Inference for a Bernoulli Process (A Bayesian View)
- On the Birnbaum argument for the strong likelihood principle
- On the Foundations of Statistical Inference
- Sequential Trials, Sequential Analysis and the Likelihood Principle
- Testing precise hypotheses. With comments and a rejoinder by the authors
- The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose
- What does the proof of Birnbaum's theorem prove?
Cited in
(4)
This page was built for publication: Blending Bayesian and Classical Tools to Define Optimal Sample-Size-Dependent Significance Levels
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5868254)