Comparing methods to assess treatment effect heterogeneity in general parametric regression models
From MaRDI portal
Cites work
- A tutorial on interaction
- Biased estimates of treatment effect in randomized experiments with nonlinear regressions and omitted covariates
- Comparing algorithms for characterizing treatment effect heterogeneity in randomized trials
- Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine.
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1104922 (Why is no real title available?)
- Maximum likelihood estimation in misspecified generalized linear models
- Model-based recursive partitioning for subgroup analyses
- Modern approaches for evaluating treatment effect heterogeneity from clinical trials and observational data
- Statistical Models
- Subgroup identification in dose-finding trials via model-based recursive partitioning
- Testing interaction between treatment and high‐dimensional covariates in randomized clinical trials
- The asymptotic theory of permutation statistics.
- The likelihood ratio test in high-dimensional logistic regression is asymptotically a rescaled Chi-square
- Tutorial in biostatistics: data-driven subgroup identification and analysis in clinical trials
- Using individualized treatment effects to assess treatment effect heterogeneity
- What makes forest-based heterogeneous treatment effect estimators work?
This page was built for publication: Comparing methods to assess treatment effect heterogeneity in general parametric regression models
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6856594)
