Computing homotopy classes for diagrams

From MaRDI portal



Abstract: We present an algorithm that, given finite simplicial sets X, A, Y with an action of a finite group G, computes the set [X,Y]GA of homotopy classes of equivariant maps ellcolonXoY extending a given equivariant map fcolonAoY under the stability assumption dimXHleq2operatornameconnYH and operatornameconnYHgeq1, for all subgroups HleqG. For fixed n=operatornamedimX, the algorithm runs in polynomial time. When the stability condition is dropped, the problem is undecidable already in the non-equivariant setting. The algorithm is obtained as a special case of a more general result: For finite diagrams of simplicial sets X, A, Y, i.e. functors mathcalImathrmopomathsfsSet, in the stable range operatornamedimXleq2operatornameconnY and operatornameconnY>1, we give an algorithm that computes the set [X,Y]A of homotopy classes of maps of diagrams ellcolonXoY extending a given fcolonAoY. Again, for fixed n=dimX, the running time of the algorithm is polynomial. The algorithm can be utilized to compute homotopy invariants in the equivariant setting -- for example, one can algorithmically compute equivariant stable homotopy groups. Further, one can apply the result to solve problems from computational topology, which we showcase on the following Tverberg-type problem: Given a k-dimensional simplicial complex K, is there a map KomathbbRd without r-tuple intersection points? In the metastable range of dimensions, rdgeq(r+1)k+3, the result of Mabillard and Wagner shows this problem equivalent to the existence of a particular equivariant map. In this range, our algorithm is applicable and, thus, the r-Tverberg problem is algorithmically decidable (in polynomial time when k, d and r are fixed).


The computation of homotopy invariants, such as the computation of the set of homotopy classes of maps, can generally be quite hard. From an algorithmic perspective, such computations are in most cases even undecidable, and they can be even harder in the equivariant setting. Building upon the previous works [\textit{M. Čadek} et al., SIAM J. Comput. 43, No. 5, 1728--1780 (2014; Zbl 1320.68099); Discrete Comput. Geom. 57, No. 4, 915--965 (2017; Zbl 1373.55018)], in the paper under review the authors present an algorithm to compute the set \([X,Y]_G^A\) of homotopy classes of \(G\)-equivariant maps from \(X\) to \(Y\) extending a given equivariant map \(A\to Y\). Here, \(X,Y\) and \(A\) denote finite simplicial sets equipped with the action of a finite group \(G\), and the algorithm is deduced under further assumptions on the dimension and connectivity of the fixed points subsets of \(X\) and \(Y\). Furthermore, if the dimension of \(X\) is fixed, the algorithm is shown to run in polynomial time. The main result of the paper was motivated by applications to the Tverberg-type problem, a generalization of the embeddability problem for simplicial complexes. In fact, Tverberg-type questions can be equivalently expressed in equivariant homotopic terms. The bridge with equivariant homotopy theory is provided by the Elmendorf's theorem [\textit{A. D. Elmendorf}, Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 277, 275--284 (1983; Zbl 0521.57027)], and it allows to focus on computing the homotopy classes of maps \([X,Y]^A\) (yielding the main result of the paper, Theorem~1.1). The proof uses tools from (equivariant) homotopy theory, such as obstruction theory and model categories, keeping an eye on the computational aspects.











This page was built for publication: Computing homotopy classes for diagrams

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6050228)