Conditional ought, a game theoretical perspective

DOI10.1007/978-3-642-24130-7_26MaRDI QIDQ3094020zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Xin Sun

Publication date 19 October 2011

Published in Logic, Rationality, and Interaction (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24130-7_26

zbMATH Keywords

conditional dominanceconsequentialist deontic logictransitivity

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Modal logic (including the logic of norms) (03B45) Games involving topology, set theory, or logic (91A44)

Recommendations

• Deontic logic for strategic games
• Conditional obligation, deontic paradoxes, and the logic of agency
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1405876
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1405890
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1405873

Cites work

• A course in game theory.
• Agency and deontic logic
• Deontic logic for strategic games
• Deontics = Betterness + Priority
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1052534 (Why is no real title available?)
• Modal logic
• Moral conflicts between groups of agents
• Obligations in a responsible world
• The logic of knowledge based obligation

Cited in

(10)

• Conditional dominance, rationalizability, and game forms
• Conditional doxastic logic with oughts and concurrent upgrades
• Deontic STIT logic, from logical paradox to security policy
• A new representation theorem for contranegative deontic logic
• Chisholm's paradox and conditional oughts
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3966013 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 795174 (Why is no real title available?)
• Deontic logic for strategic games
• Coarse deontic logic
• Ought-contextualism and reasoning

This page was built for publication: Conditional ought, a game theoretical perspective

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3094020)