Deep fried logic
From MaRDI portal
Recommendations
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3648682 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3124827 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3891328 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3504935 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6868317 (Why is no real title available?)
- An introduction to non-classical logic. From if to is
- Combinatory logic. Pure, applied and typed
- Display logic
- Four-valued semantics for relevant logics (and some of their rivals)
- Free of Detachment: Logic, Rationality, and Gluts
- HYPERDOCTRINES, NATURAL DEDUCTION AND THE BECK CONDITION
- Intuitive semantics for first-degree entailments and `coupled trees'
- Logic on the Australian plan
- MULTIPLE-CONCLUSION LP AND DEFAULT CLASSICALITY
- Models for entailment
- Negation on the Australian plan
- Notes on stratified semantics
- On permutation in simplified semantics
- On the ternary relation and conditionality
- Relevance for the classical logician
- Relevance: A fallacy?
- Simplified semantics for basic relevant logics
- Simplified semantics for relevant logics (and some of their rivals)
- The American plan completed: Alternative classical-style semantics, without stars, for relevant and paraconsistent logics
- The Gentzenization and decidability of RW
- The completeness of the first-order functional calculus
- The semantics of entailment. II
- The semantics of entailment. III
- Truth without contra(di)ction
- \(\mathrm{LP}^{+}\), \(\mathrm{K3}^{+}\), \(\mathrm{FDE}^{+}\), and their `classical collapse'
- ``Four-valued semantics for the relevant logic R
Cited in
(3)
This page was built for publication: Deep fried logic
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6651286)
