Negation on the Australian plan

DOI10.1007/S10992-019-09510-2zbMATH Open1457.03007OpenAlexW2936357383WikidataQ128008510 ScholiaQ128008510MaRDI QIDQ2295602FDOQ2295602

Authors: Francesco Berto, Greg Restall 

Publication date: 14 February 2020

Published in: Journal of Philosophical Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-019-09510-2

Recommendations

• Another plan for negation
• Negation on the neo-Australian plan
• Two negations are more than one
• Bridging the two plans in the semantics for relevant logic
• Negation in the light of modal logic

zbMATH Keywords

many-valued logicsmodal logicsnegationnon-classical logicsKripke semanticscompatibility semantics

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Modal logic (including the logic of norms) (03B45) Substructural logics (including relevance, entailment, linear logic, Lambek calculus, BCK and BCI logics) (03B47) Many-valued logic (03B50)

Cites Work

• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Truth values and proof theory
• The semantics of entailment. II
• Negation in relevant logics. (How I stopped worrying and learned to love the Routley star)
• Negation, absurdity and contrariety
• An introduction to non-classical logic. From if to is
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• The Semantics of First Degree Entailment
• Multiple conclusions
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Negation in the context of gaggle theory
• Constructive negation, implication, and co-implication
• Bilattices and the semantics of logic programming
• Logical pluralism
• Semantic analysis of orthologic
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Four-valued semantics for relevant logics (and some of their rivals)
• The American plan completed: Alternative classical-style semantics, without stars, for relevant and paraconsistent logics
• Defining double negation elimination
• A star-free semantics for R
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Generalized ortho negation
• Logic on the Australian plan
• Absolute contradiction, dialetheism, and revenge
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• There is more to negation than modality
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)

Cited In (22)

• An invitation to new essays on Belnap-Dunn logic
• Bridging the two plans in the semantics for relevant logic
• Two negations are more than one
• SUBSTITUTION IN RELEVANT LOGICS
• Truthmaker semantics for relevant logic
• Questions to Michael Dunn
• The problem of future contingents: scoping out a solution
• There is more to negation than modality
• The logic of lexical connectives
• On negation for non-classical set theories
• Shrieking, shrugging, and the Australian plan
• Negative inquisitiveness and alternatives-based negation
• No, No, and No
• Epistemic logics for relevant reasoners
• Another plan for negation
• Deep fried logic
• Negation on the neo-Australian plan
• Non-Boolean classical relevant logics. I
• Subminimal negation on the Australian plan
• What is a relevant connective?
• A hyperintensional logic of non-prime evidence
• Connexive negation

This page was built for publication: Negation on the Australian plan

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2295602)