Embeddings between operator-valued dyadic BMO spaces

Publication date 15 October 2009

Published in Illinois Journal of Mathematics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://arxiv.org/abs/0805.0620, https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.ijm/1254403715

dyadic BMO operator-valued BMO paraproduct

(H^p)-spaces (42B30) Function spaces arising in harmonic analysis (42B35) Toeplitz operators, Hankel operators, Wiener-Hopf operators (47B35)

Abstract: We investigate a scale of dyadic operator-valued BMO spaces, corresponding to the different yet equivalent characterizations of dyadic BMO in the scalar case. In the language of operator spaces, we investigate different operator space structures on the scalar dyadic BMO space which arise naturally from the different characterisations of scalar BMO. We also give sharp dimensional growth estimates for the sweep of functions and its bilinear extension in some of those different dyadic BMO spaces.

Review text

Let \({\mathcal D}\) denote the collection of dyadic subintervals of the unit circle \(\mathbb T\), and \((h_I)_{I \in {\mathcal D}}\) be the Haar basis of \(L^2({\mathbb T})\). For \(I \in {\mathcal D}\) and \(\phi \in L^2({\mathbb T})\), let \(\phi_I\) denote the formal Haar coefficient \(\int_I \phi (t) h_I (t)dt\). We say that \(\phi\) belongs to dyadic BMO space \(BMO^d ({\mathbb T})\) if \[ \sup_{I \in {\mathcal D}} \left( \frac{1}{| I |} \int_I | \phi (t) - m_I \phi |^2 dt \right)^{1/2} < \infty, \] where \(m_I \phi = \frac{1}{| I |}\int_I \phi (t) dt\). Then the following are equivalent: (1) \(\phi \in BMO^d ({\mathbb T})\). (2) \(\phi\) satisfies the Carleson condition \[ \sup_{I \in {\mathcal D}} \left( \frac{1}{| I |} \sum_{J \in {\mathcal D}, J \subset I} | \phi_J |^2 \right)^{1/2} < \infty. \] (3) The paraproduct \( \pi_{\phi}f = \sum_{I \in {\mathcal D}} \phi_I (m_I f ) h_I \) is bounded on \(L^2\). Furthermore we know that \(BMO^d ({\mathbb T})\) is the dual space of the dyadic Hardy space \(H^1_d ({\mathbb T})\). The authors prove that in the operator valued case, these characterizations are in general no longer equivalent. About operator valued BMO, see \textit{T. Mei} [Mem. Am. Math. Soc. 881, 64 p. (2007; Zbl 1138.46038)].

Recommendations

Cites work

Cited in

(13)

This page was built for publication: Embeddings between operator-valued dyadic BMO spaces

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q733353)