Finding a tree structure in a resolution proof is NP-complete
From MaRDI portal
Recommendations
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5899257 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1361489 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3313427 (Why is no real title available?)
- Minimum propositional proof length is NP-hard to linearly approximate
- Near optimal seperation of tree-like and general resolution
- Reducibility among combinatorial problems
- Resolution Is Not Automatizable Unless W[P] Is Tractable
- Resolution Trees with Lemmas: Resolution Refinements that Characterize DLL Algorithms with Clause Learning
- Short proofs are narrow—resolution made simple
- The NP-hardness of finding a directed acyclic graph for regular resolution
- The intractability of resolution
- The relative efficiency of propositional proof systems
Cited in
(6)- Pool resolution is NP-hard to recognize
- The NP-hardness of finding a directed acyclic graph for regular resolution
- Finding compact scheme forests in nested normal form is NP-hard
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7238987 (Why is no real title available?)
- A complexity gap for tree resolution
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1522926 (Why is no real title available?)
This page was built for publication: Finding a tree structure in a resolution proof is NP-complete
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1019749)