Pool resolution is NP-hard to recognize
From MaRDI portal
Recommendations
- Pool Resolution and Its Relation to Regular Resolution and DPLL with Clause Learning
- An improved separation of regular resolution from pool resolution and clause learning
- Resolution Trees with Lemmas: Resolution Refinements that Characterize DLL Algorithms with Clause Learning
- Automating resolution is NP-hard
- Small Stone in pool
- Improved separations of regular resolution from clause learning proof systems
- Extended resolution simulates binary decision diagrams
- Determinization of Resolution by an Algorithm Operating on Complete Assignments
- 2 -Way vs.d -Way Branching for CSP
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1765669 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1361489 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2243370 (Why is no real title available?)
- Finding a tree structure in a resolution proof is NP-complete
- Minimum propositional proof length is NP-hard to linearly approximate
- Pool Resolution and Its Relation to Regular Resolution and DPLL with Clause Learning
- Resolution Is Not Automatizable Unless W[P] Is Tractable
- Resolution Trees with Lemmas: Resolution Refinements that Characterize DLL Algorithms with Clause Learning
- The NP-hardness of finding a directed acyclic graph for regular resolution
Cited in
(5)
This page was built for publication: Pool resolution is NP-hard to recognize
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1042441)