How to Solve Consensus in the Smallest Window of Synchrony
From MaRDI portal
Recommendations
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 996442 (Why is no real title available?)
- Early stopping in Byzantine agreement
- Fast Paxos
- Impossibility of distributed consensus with one faulty process
- Indulgent algorithms (preliminary version)
- Knowledge and common knowledge in a distributed environment
- Lower bounds for asynchronous consensus
- Reaching Agreement in the Presence of Faults
- Round-by-round fault detectors (extended abstract), unifying synchrony and asynchrony
- The Byzantine Generals Problem
- The inherent price of indulgence
- The inherent price of indulgence
- The overhead of consensus failure recovery
- The weakest failure detector for solving consensus
- Timeliness, failure-detectors, and consensus performance
- Unreliable failure detectors for reliable distributed systems
Cited in
(6)- Making Byzantine consensus live
- Making Byzantine consensus live
- Generating fast indulgent algorithms
- You only live multiple times: a blackbox solution for reusing crash-stop algorithms in realistic crash-recovery settings
- A Paxos based algorithm to minimize the overhead of process recovery in consensus
- Of choices, failures and asynchrony: the many faces of set agreement
This page was built for publication: How to Solve Consensus in the Smallest Window of Synchrony
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3540219)