Inconsistent treatment estimates from mis-specified logistic regression analyses of randomized trials
From MaRDI portal
Cites work
- A geometric approach to assess bias due to omitted covariates in generalized linear models
- Assessing the Sensitivity of Regression Results to Unmeasured Confounders in Observational Studies
- Biased estimates of treatment effect in randomized experiments with nonlinear regressions and omitted covariates
- Calculating the power or sample size for the logistic and proportional hazards models
- Conditional and marginal models: another view (with comments and rejoinder)
- Confounding and collapsibility in causal inference
- Hidden truncation models
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 627766 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 775283 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2201473 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2237384 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3069580 (Why is no real title available?)
- Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Misspecified Models
- Model Selection and Model Averaging
- Models for Longitudinal Data: A Generalized Estimating Equation Approach
- Simpson's Paradox and Related Phenomena
- Some Surprising Results about Covariate Adjustment in Logistic Regression Models
- Specification error in multinomial logit models. Analysis of the omitted variable bias
- Tables for Computing Bivariate Normal Probabilities
- The amalgamation and geometry of two-by-two contingency tables
- The skew-normal and related families. With the collaboration of Antonella Capitanio.
This page was built for publication: Inconsistent treatment estimates from mis-specified logistic regression analyses of randomized trials
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6904132)
