Incorporating heterogeneity in non-parametric models: a methodological comparison
Summary: The operational environment can heavily influence the efficiency scores of the evaluated observations. If heterogeneity among entities is neglected, the efficiency evaluation is strongly biased. In this paper, we discuss five methodologies to incorporate heterogeneity in non-parametric frontier models which are robust for outlying observations. In particular, we examine the frontier separation approach, the all-in-one model, the two-stage model, the multi-stage approach and the conditional efficiency measures. We discuss their appropriateness on a simulated and a real-world drinking water data set. Although, the outcomes are closely related on average, the robust conditional efficiency procedure seems to be superior.
- Unobserved heterogeneity and endogeneity in nonparametric frontier estimation
- Explaining inefficiency in nonparametric production models: the state of the art
- Data envelopment analysis with heterogeneous data: an application
- Nonparametric efficiency analysis: a multivariate conditional quantile approach
- Influential observations in frontier models, a robust non-oriented approach to the water sector
- The impact of operating environment on efficiency of public libraries
- Efficiency assessment of primary care providers: a conditional nonparametric approach
- Treating unobserved heterogeneity in PLS path modeling: a comparison of FIMIX-PLS with different data analysis strategies
- Data envelopment analysis: a review and synthesis
- Malmquist productivity index from a regulator's perspective
This page was built for publication: Incorporating heterogeneity in non-parametric models: a methodological comparison
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q604781)