Strong counterexamples to Borel hyperdeterminacy (Q1190620)
From MaRDI portal
!
This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 55781
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| default for all languages | No label defined |
||
| English | Strong counterexamples to Borel hyperdeterminacy |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 55781 |
Statements
Strong counterexamples to Borel hyperdeterminacy (English)
0 references
26 September 1992
0 references
With respect to two-person games of hyperfinite length in which the set of all plays of the game is internal and the set of plays by which a specified player wins is possibly external, Cutland asked whether or not games in which the winning sets are Borel (with respect to a hyperfinite set) are also hyperdetermined, where hyperdetermine means that one player has an internal winning strategy. In this paper, the author gives three examples, two of his own and one from Jin Renling, that answer the question negatively.
0 references
hyperfinite games
0 references
hyperdeterminacy
0 references
two-person games of hyperfinite length
0 references
hyperfinite set
0 references
0.8057116270065308
0 references
