Strong counterexamples to Borel hyperdeterminacy

DOI10.1007/BF01269950MaRDI QIDQ1190620zbMATH OpenOpenAlexWikidataFDO

Authors C. Ward Henson

Publication date 26 September 1992

Published in Archive for Mathematical Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01269950

zbMATH Keywords

hyperdeterminacyhyperfinite gameshyperfinite settwo-person games of hyperfinite length

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Descriptive set theory (03E15) Determinacy principles (03E60) Nonstandard models in mathematics (03H05)

Review text

With respect to two-person games of hyperfinite length in which the set of all plays of the game is internal and the set of plays by which a specified player wins is possibly external, Cutland asked whether or not games in which the winning sets are Borel (with respect to a hyperfinite set) are also hyperdetermined, where hyperdetermine means that one player has an internal winning strategy. In this paper, the author gives three examples, two of his own and one from Jin Renling, that answer the question negatively.

Recommendations

• Determinateness of certain almost-Borel games
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1080110
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4027214
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4061224

Cites work

• Borel determinacy
• Descriptive set theory over hyperfinite sets
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3933369 (Why is no real title available?)
• Unbounded Loeb Measures

Cited in

(3)

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6010992 (Why is no real title available?)
• CALIBRATING DETERMINACY STRENGTH IN LEVELS OF THE BOREL HIERARCHY
• Borel combinatorics fail in HYP

This page was built for publication: Strong counterexamples to Borel hyperdeterminacy

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1190620)