Real spinor fields and the electroweak interaction (Q1268778)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Real spinor fields and the electroweak interaction
scientific article

    Statements

    Real spinor fields and the electroweak interaction (English)
    0 references
    25 May 1999
    0 references
    Starting from fact that the space of real spinor fields of mass \(m>0\) on a Minkowskian spacetime is the direct sum of two irreducibly invariant subspaces under the connected Poincaré group \({\mathbf P}\), the author shows that these subspaces admit unique \({\mathbf P}\)-invariant positive-energy complex unitarizable structures in terms of which they are unitarily, and canonically, equivalent to the conventional ``left'' electron, and ``right'' positron subspaces defined by the Dirac electron. It is shown that space reversal \(P\) and time reversal \(T\) act \({\mathbf P}\)-covariantly as anti-unitary operators on these real fields and extend to complex fields in terms of which \(P\) exchanges the two subspaces while \(T\) acts separately on each subspace. When \(m=0\), the identical formalism produces a rigorous version of the usual neutrino formalism. Finally, it is shown that the real context of the usual spinor-vector interaction is equivalent to the V-A interaction, together with a computationally equivalent form of quantum electrodynamics in which the notions of a ``right'' and ``left'' electron are redundant. Contents include: an introduction; complex structures in real spinor fields; discrete symmetries; eigenstates of the basic quantum numbers; interactions in the real spinor formalism; and a discussion.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    Minkowski spacetime
    0 references
    real spinor fields
    0 references
    unitarizable structures
    0 references
    space reversal
    0 references
    time reversal
    0 references
    anti-unitary operators
    0 references
    neutrino formalism
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references