Hereditary orders and embeddings of local fields in simple algebras (Q1271002)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Hereditary orders and embeddings of local fields in simple algebras
scientific article

    Statements

    Hereditary orders and embeddings of local fields in simple algebras (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    4 March 1999
    0 references
    Let \(F\) be a commutative locally compact non-archimedean field, \(D\) a central \(F\)-division algebra of index \(d^2\), and \(V\) a right \(D\)-vector space of finite dimension. Let \(G\) denote the group of units of \(A\), the \(D\)-endomorphism ring of \(V\). The smooth complex representations of \(G\) have been classified if \(A\) is either split or a division algebra. In each case, certain field extensions \(E/F\subset A\), called pure extensions, play a rôle. \textit{A. Fröhlich} [Proc. Lond. Math. Soc., III. Ser. 54, 247-266 (1987; Zbl 0615.12021)] pointed out that certain pure extensions are undesirable when \(A\) is neither split nor a division algebra. Fröhlich described extensions that he called sound extensions, and the current author generalizes this to the notion he calls good extensions. He then gives a complete study of good extensions. Each extension \(E/F\) determines a sequence of lattices in \(V_E\), and hence, a hereditary order. The condition for goodness is explicitly described in terms of an embedding of the residue field \(k_E\) into a \(k_F\) algebra of finite dimension.
    0 references
    hereditary orders
    0 references
    locally compact fields
    0 references
    locally compact groups
    0 references
    central division algebras
    0 references
    pure extensions
    0 references
    good extensions
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references