Two theorems on elementary contractions (Q1318159)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Two theorems on elementary contractions
scientific article

    Statements

    Two theorems on elementary contractions (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    16 June 1994
    0 references
    Let \(X\) be a nonsingular projective variety over \(\mathbb{C}\), with \(n=\dim X \geq 4\). Let \(L\) be an ample line bundle over \(X\). Here we study projective maps of \(X\), \(f: X \to Y\), associated to the linear system of \(m(K_ X+rL)\), where \(r\) and \(m\) are positive integers, \(m\) sufficiently large (hence \(f\) has connected fibers and \(Y\) is normal). In particular we prove: Theorem A. Let \(f:X \to Y\) be an elementary small contraction whose good supporting divisor is \(K_ X+(n-3)L\). Then the exceptional locus \(E\) of \(f\) is a disjoint union of its irreducible components \(E_ i\) \((i=1,\dots,n)\) such that \(E_ i \cong \mathbb{P}^{n-2}\) and \(N_{E_ i/X} \cong {\mathcal O}_{\mathbb{P}^{n-2}} (-1)^{\oplus 2}\). Moreover there exists a flip \(f^ +:X^ + \to Y\) of \(f\) from a nonsingular projective variety \(X^ +\). This is a generalization to higher dimension of the case \(n=4\) proved by \textit{Y. Kawamata} [Math. Ann. 284, No. 4, 595-600 (1989; Zbl 0668.14008)]. In the case \(L\) is very ample the theorem was proved in a completely different way by \textit{M. Andreatta}, \textit{E. Ballico} and \textit{J. Wiśniewski} [in Classification of irregular varieties, minimal models and abelian varieties, Proc. Conf. Trento 1990, Lect. Notes Math. 1515, 1-11 (1992; Zbl 0787.14034)]. Theorem B. Let \(f:X \to Y\) be a contraction map onto a \(d\)-dimensional normal variety \(Y\) whose good supporting divisor if \(K_ X+rL\), where \(r=n-d\). Suppose that \(f\) is an elementary contraction and that it is equidimensional. Then \(Y\) is smooth, \({\mathcal E}:=f_ *L\) is a locally free sheaf of rank \(r+2\) and \(X\) embeds over \(Y\) into \(\mathbb{P} ({\mathcal E})\) as a divisor of relative degree 2. For further results similar to theorem \(B\) (case \(m=2\) and without the hypothesis of elementary, equidimensional contraction) we refer to (2,3) in the paper by \textit{M. Beltrametti} and \textit{A. J. Sommese} [J. Math. Soc. Japan 43, No. 2, 381-412 (1991; Zbl 0754.14027)] and to the Ph. D. thesis of \textit{G. M. Besana} (Notre Dame Univ).
    0 references
    small contraction
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references