Subtrees and subforests of graphs (Q1328385)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Subtrees and subforests of graphs
scientific article

    Statements

    Subtrees and subforests of graphs (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    9 January 1995
    0 references
    Let \(G\) be a finite, simple graph. Let \(| G |\), \(e(G)\), \(\Delta (G)\), and \(\delta (G)\) denote respectively the order, size, maximum degree, and minimum degree of \(G\). For two positive integers \(k\) and \(n\) \((>k)\) set \[ f(k,n) = \max \left\{{2k - 1 \choose 2}, {k - 1 \choose 2} + (k - 1) (n - k + 1) \right\}. \] A graph \(G\) is said to contain a graph \(H\) if \(H\) can be embedded in \(G\), i.e. \(G\) contains a subgraph isomorphic with \(H\). The author gives elegant proofs to the following two theorems. Theorem 1. Suppose \(G\) is a graph of size \(e(G) > f(k,n)\). Then \(G\) contains every forest on \(k\) edges without isolated vertices. Theorem 2. Let \(r\) be a positive integer. Suppose \(G\) is a graph of order \(n \geq r^ 2 - r + 1\) with \(\Delta (G) = n - 1\) and \(\delta (G) \geq n - r\). Then \(G\) contains all trees of order \(| G |\). Theorem 1 answers a long-standing conjecture (posed in 1963) of Erdős and Sòs in the affirmative. Theorem 2 improves a result due to \textit{R. J. Faudreee}, \textit{C. C. Rousseau}, \textit{R. H. Schelp} and \textit{S. Schuster} [Isr. J. Math. 35, 177-185 (1980; Zbl 0436.05020)].
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    embedding
    0 references
    subgraph
    0 references
    forest
    0 references
    trees
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references