On Kervaire and Murthy's conjecture. (Q1415010)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
On Kervaire and Murthy's conjecture.
scientific article

    Statements

    On Kervaire and Murthy's conjecture. (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    3 December 2003
    0 references
    The conjecture is concerned with the natural exact sequence [see \textit{M. A. Kervaire} and \textit{M. P. Murthy}, Comment. Math. Helv. 52, 415--452 (1977; Zbl 0355.12009)], \(V_n\rightarrowtail \text{Pic} (\mathbb{Z} C_{n+1}) \twoheadrightarrow \text{Cl} (\mathbb{Q} (\zeta_{n+1})) \oplus \text{Pic} (\mathbb{Z} C_n)\) relating the Picard groups of the integral group rings \(\mathbb{Z} C_k\), \(C_k=\) cyclic of order \(p^k\), to the ideal class group of the cyclotomic field \(\mathbb{Q} (\zeta_{n+1})\) generated by a root of unity \(\zeta_{n+1}\) of order \(p^{n+1}\). Here, \(p\) is a semi-regular prime (meaning that \(p\nmid h_{\mathbb{Q} (\zeta_1+ \zeta_1^{-1})})\). With respect to the above appearing kernel \(V_n\) one has a splitting \(V_n= V_n^+\times V_n^-\), an explicit description of \(V_n^-\), and a canonical injection \(\widehat{V_n^+} \rightarrowtail (\text{Cl} (\mathbb{Q} (\zeta_n)))_p\) of the group of characters of \(V_n^+\) into the Sylow \(p\)-subgroup of \(\text{Cl} (\mathbb{Q} (\zeta_n))\). The conjecture says that this latter map is surjective. This is verified in the paper under review, provided that \(p\) is odd, semi-regular and, in addition, 2-regular (which means that \(B_{1,\omega^{i-1}} \not\equiv 0\bmod p^2\) and \(\frac{B_i}{i} \not\equiv \frac{B_{i+p-1}} {i+p-1}\bmod p^2\) where \(\omega\) is the Teichmüller character and \(i\) runs through the even indices between 2 and \(p-3\) with \(p\) dividing the numerator of \(B_i\)). The proof is based on certain norm maps \(\mathbb{Z} [\zeta_{k+i+1}]\to \mathbb{Z} [x]/ \frac{x^{p^{k-i}-1}} {x^{p^k}-1}\), on Mayer-Vietoris exact sequences for \(\text{Pic} (\mathbb{Z} C_n)\) when \(p\) is 2-regular, and, moreover, on ramification theory (but not on Iwasawa theory, as in Kervaire's and Murthy's paper).
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references