On doubly structured matrices and pencils that arise in linear response theory. (Q1428608)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
On doubly structured matrices and pencils that arise in linear response theory.
scientific article

    Statements

    On doubly structured matrices and pencils that arise in linear response theory. (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    29 March 2004
    0 references
    In linear response theory, consider the problem of finding the eigenvalues of the pencil \((\lambda E_0 - A_0)(x) = 0,\) \(x \in \mathbb{C}^n,\) where: \[ E_0 = \left[ \begin{matrix} C & Z\\ -Z & -C \end{matrix} \right] ,\quad A_0 = \left[ \begin{matrix} A & B\\ B & A \end{matrix} \right], \] \(A,B,C,Z \in \mathbb{C}^{n \times n},\) \(A=A^*,\) \(B = A^*,\) \(C = A^*,\) \(Z = - A^*.\) If \(H \in \mathbb{C}^{n \times n}\) is a nonsingular and Hermitian or skew-Hermitian matrix , then a matrix \(A\in\mathbb{C}^{n \times n}\) is called \(H\)-self-adjoint (respectively \(H\)-skew-adjoint, \(H\)-unitary) if \(A^*H = HA\) (respectively \(A^*H =-HA\), \(A^*HA = H\)). With: \[ \Sigma=\left[ \begin{matrix} I_n & O\\ O & -I_n \end{matrix} \right],\quad \Gamma = \left[ \begin{matrix} O & I_n\\ I_n & 0 \end{matrix} \right],\quad J = \left[ \begin{matrix} O & I_n\\ -I_n & O \end{matrix} \right], \] \[ \mathbb{G}\mathbb{P}_{2n} = \{U \in \mathbb{C}^{2n \times 2n}; J^{-1}U^*J = \Gamma^{-1}U^*\Gamma, det(U) \neq 0\}; \] \(A \in \mathbb{C}^{n \times n}\) is called Hamiltonian, skew-Hamiltonian, and symplectic if \(A\) is \(J\)-skew-adjoint, \(J\)-self-adjoint, \(J\)-unitary, respectively. A pencil \(\lambda M - N \in \mathbb{C}^{2n \times 2n}\) is called \(\Gamma\)-self-adjoint, if \(M\) and \(N\) are \(\Gamma\)-self-adjoint; \(\lambda M - N\) is called skew-Hamiltonian/Hamiltonian, if \(M\) is skew-Hamiltonian and \(N\) is Hamiltonian. Among other results, the authors prove: Let \({\mathcal B}=\lambda {\mathcal E}-{\mathcal A} \in \mathbb{C}^{2n \times 2n}\) be an \(\infty\)-regular, \(\Gamma\)-self-adjoint, and skew-Hamiltonian/Hamiltonian pencil. 1) If there exists a matrix \(P \in \mathbb{G}\mathbb{P}_{2n}: J^{-1}P^*J {\mathcal B}P\) is in anti-triangular form, then there exists an unitary matrix \(Q \in \mathbb{G}\mathbb{P}_{2n}:J^{-1}Q^*J {\mathcal B}Q\) is in anti-triangular form. 2) If \(\lambda_0\) is a non-real and not purely imaginary eigenvalue having algebraic multiplicity \(r\), then there exists an unitary matrix \[ {\mathcal P} = diag(P_1,P_2) \in \mathbb{G}\mathbb{P}_{2n}: J^{-1}{\mathcal P}^*J {\mathcal B}{\mathcal P} = \lambda \left[ \begin{matrix} {\hat E} & O\\ O & {\hat E}^* \end{matrix} \right] -\left[ \begin{matrix} O & {\hat G}\\ {\hat H} & O \end{matrix} \right]; \] where the matrices \({\hat E}\), \({\hat G}\), \({\hat H}\) have the form: \[ X = \left[ \begin{matrix} O & O & X_{13}\\ O & X_{22} & X_{23}\\ X_{31} & X_{32} & X_{33} \end{matrix} \right] ; \] with \(X_{13} , X_{31} \in \mathbb{C}^{r \times r}\) lower anti-triangular. It is interesting that the existence of transformation associated with anti-triangular form implies the existence of associated unitary transformation, and numerically stable algorithms .
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    Self-adjoint matrix
    0 references
    Skew-adjoint matrix
    0 references
    Matrix pencil
    0 references
    Hartree-Fock model
    0 references
    Random phase approximation
    0 references
    Anti-triangular form
    0 references
    Canonical form
    0 references
    Condensed form
    0 references
    Skew-Hamiltonian/Hamiltonian pencil
    0 references
    eigenvalues
    0 references