Prediction proberties of Aitken's iterated \(\Delta^2\) process, of Wynn's epsilon algorithm, and of Brezinski's iterated theta algorithm (Q1590791)

From MaRDI portal





scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Prediction proberties of Aitken's iterated \(\Delta^2\) process, of Wynn's epsilon algorithm, and of Brezinski's iterated theta algorithm
    scientific article

      Statements

      Prediction proberties of Aitken's iterated \(\Delta^2\) process, of Wynn's epsilon algorithm, and of Brezinski's iterated theta algorithm (English)
      0 references
      29 November 2001
      0 references
      The paper is concerned with double sequences \( f(i,k|z) ( i,k \geq 0) \) of functions obtained from partial sums \( f(i,0|z) = \{ \sum c(\tau) z^{\tau} |0 \leq \tau < i \} \). It is supposed that integers \( \xi(i,k) \geq 0 \) exist such that \[ f(i,k|z) \sim f(\xi(i,k),0|z) + z^{\xi(i,k)} g(i,k|z) \] where \( g(i,k|z) \) is associated with an ascending formal power series whose first coefficient \( d(i,k) \) differs from \( c(\xi(i,k)) \). For the cases in which the functions \( f \) are produced by repeated application of Aitken's process and by use of the epsilon- and theta-algorithms, recursions for the \( g(i,k|z) \) are given. Three remarks are perhaps in order. (a) In the case of the epsilon-algorithm, it follows from Satz 5.6 on p. 243 of \textit{O. Perron}'s book [Die Lehre von den Kettenbrüchen, Bd.\ II, Teubner (1957; Zbl 0077.06602)] that the difference \( d(i,k) - c(\xi(i,k)) \) is expressible as a quotient of two Hankel determinants. Such determinants satisfy a simple recursion, as do the ratios themselves: the cumbersome construction given in the paper may be discarded. Furthermore, when \[ c(\tau) = \Bigl\{ \prod \{ ( A - q^{\alpha + \nu }) / ( B - q^{\beta + \nu }) \} \mid 0 \leq \nu < \tau \Bigr\} \] the Hankel determinant quotients may be expressed in simple closed form of which there exist many special cases obtained by giving \( q \), \( A \), \( \alpha \), \( B \) and \( \beta \) particular values (one of the cases is that used as a numerical illustration in the paper). (b) In a numerical investigation it is supposed that \textit{ceteris paribus } a smaller value of the leading coefficient difference modulus \( |d(i,k) - c(\xi(i,k)) |\) implies a smaller value of \( |f(i,k|z) - C(z) |\), where \( C(z) \) is the sum associated with the power series having coefficients \( c \), but this may not be so. (c) For the numerical example chosen, corresponding repeated application of the epsilon-algorithm causes a dramatic increase in the rate of convergence (inclusion of this variant in the comparison would, of course, greatly have detracted from the interest of the results).
      0 references
      0 references
      Aitken's process
      0 references
      epsilon algorithm
      0 references
      theta algorithm
      0 references
      convergence rate
      0 references
      numerical example
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references

      Identifiers