Structure of certain Weyl modules for the spin groups (Q1645008)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Structure of certain Weyl modules for the spin groups
scientific article

    Statements

    Structure of certain Weyl modules for the spin groups (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    22 June 2018
    0 references
    Let $K$ be an algebraically closed field of positive characteristic $p$ and let $G$ be a simple, simply connected linear algebraic group over $K$. The structure of irreducible $KG$-modules is still unknown. Fixing a Borel subgroup $B$ and a maximal torus $T$ contained in it, the irreducible, rational modules $L_G(\lambda)$ for $G$ are in bijective correspondence with the dominant weights $\lambda \in X^+(T)$. Then, for each $\lambda \in X^+(T)$, the irreducible module $L_G(\lambda)$ is isomorphic to $V_G(\lambda)$ by its radical, where the Weyl module $V_G(\lambda)$ is a universal highest weight module of highest weight $\lambda$. One knows formulae to obtain the dimension etc. of $V_G(\lambda)$ but the composition factors seem out of reach at the moment. This is equivalent to finding weight multiplicities in simple modules for $G$, and has been done for large $p$ and small $\lambda$ in a recursive fashion using Kazhdan-Lusztig polynomials. In small rank, Jantzen's $p$-sum formula has proved useful. In the paper under review, the author determines the structure of Weyl modules for $G =\mathrm{Spin}(W)$ with $W$, a $K$-vector space of dimension $\geq 5$ and $p \neq 2$. He adopts an idea of McNinch, generalizes and uses it here. \textit{G. McNinch} [Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) 76, No. 1, 1 (1998; Zbl 0891.20032)] had proved: \par Let $V$ be a finite-dimensional, rational $KG$-module and let $\lambda$ be a dominant weight of $V$. Assume that $V$ is a tilting module. Then, there exists an injection $i \in \mathrm{Hom}_{KG}(V_G(\tau),V)$ and a surjection $\phi \in\mathrm{Hom}_{KG}(V,H^0(\tau))$. \par Generalizing McNinch's result [loc. cit.], the author proves: \par Let $V$ be as above. Identify $V_G(\tau)$ with its image under the injection $i$ above, and writing \[\operatorname{ch}(V) = \chi(\tau) + \sum_{\mu \in X^+(T)} a_{\mu} \operatorname{ch}(L_G(\mu)) \] we have for every $\mu \neq \tau$ that \[V_G(\tau):L_G(\mu)] \leq a_{\mu}. \] The author uses the above generalization to determine the composition factors of a carefully-chosen tilting module in order to reduce the list of possible composition factors for $V_G(\lambda)$. Then, he uses a truncated version of Jantzen's $p$-sum formula in a suitable form. This enables him to obtain the dimensions of the corresponding irreducible $KG$-modules. The author states the results for the types $B_n$ ($n \geq 2$) and $D_n$ ($n \geq 3$) in terms of tables that give the radicals corresponding to certain highest weights and the corresponding dimensions of the irreducible module. In fact, as $\operatorname{char} K \neq 2$, for $B_n$ as well as $D_n$, any Weyl module of highest weight in $\Lambda(G)$ is irreducible. The certain weights referred to above are those in $\omega_1 + \Lambda(G)$. McNinch [loc. cit.] has dealt with the special case $\omega_1 + \omega_2$. The methods used in the paper cannot work for the groups of type $C_n$ because in this case the Weyl modules having fundamental weights as highest weights are not necessarily irreducible, even when $\operatorname{char}K \neq 2$. \par The paper is written very clearly.
    0 references
    Weyl modules
    0 references
    Verma modules
    0 references
    dominant weights
    0 references
    tilting modules
    0 references
    composition factors
    0 references
    spin groups in positive characteristic
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers