A tight bound on the projective dimension of four quadrics (Q1748109)
From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | A tight bound on the projective dimension of four quadrics |
scientific article |
Statements
A tight bound on the projective dimension of four quadrics (English)
0 references
2 May 2018
0 references
Let \(S = k[x_1,\dots,x_n]\) be a polynomial ring over a field \(k\). Let \(I = (f_1,\dots,f_N)\) be a homogeneous ideal in \(S\), and set \(d_i = \deg (f_i)\) for all \(1 \leq i \leq N\). An important question due to M. Stillman is whether there is a bound on the projective dimension \(\text{pd}(S/I)\) that depends only on \(d_1,\dots,d_N\) and \(N\). This was settled by \textit{T. Ananyan} and \textit{M. Hochster} [Math. Res. Lett. 19, No. 1, 233--244 (2012; Zbl 1276.13014)], leaving open the question of how optimal the bounds can be shown to be. Different authors, including Ananyan and Hochster and also including the present authors, have previously considered the case of \(N\) quadrics (i.e. homogenous polynomials of degree 2) and the case of a small number of cubics, obtaining sharper bounds, but these are still far from optimal. In the present paper, the authors show that if \(I\) is generated by four quadrics then the projective dimension of \(S/I\) is at most 6. Combined with examples of \textit{J. McCullough} [Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 139, No. 6, 2017--2023 (2011; Zbl 1215.13007), this bound is optimal. To achieve this result, the authors follow an approach pioneered by \textit{B. Engheta} [J. Algebra 316, No. 2, 715--734 (2007; Zbl 1132.13006); J. Symb. Comput. 45, No. 1, 60--73 (2010; Zbl 1179.13009)], but they need to introduce an array of new ideas.
0 references
projective dimension
0 references
quadrics
0 references
Castelnuovo-Mumford regularity
0 references
Stillman's conjecture
0 references
0 references