On the nonexistence of boundary branch points for minimal surfaces spanning smooth contours. II (Q1761404)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
On the nonexistence of boundary branch points for minimal surfaces spanning smooth contours. II
scientific article

    Statements

    On the nonexistence of boundary branch points for minimal surfaces spanning smooth contours. II (English)
    0 references
    15 November 2012
    0 references
    This paper is concerned with nonexistence of boundary branch points for conformal immersions spanning a smooth curve \(\Gamma\) which are local minimizers of the Dirichlet energy (or area functional). Previous results on nonexistence for absolute minima of the area were given by \textit{R. Osserman} [Symp. Math. 10, 141--158 (1972; Zbl 0254.53002)] for interior branch points, \textit{R. Gulliver} et al. [Am. J. Math. 95, 750-812 (1973; Zbl 0295.53002)], \textit{R. Gulliver} [Ann. Math. (2) 97, 275--305 (1973; Zbl 0246.53053)], and \textit{M. J. Micallef} and \textit{B. White} [Ann. Math. (2) 141, No. 1, 35--85 (1995; Zbl 0873.53038)] for boundary branch points when the curve \(\Gamma\) is analytic. For sufficiently smooth \(\Gamma\) (not necessarily analytic), interior branch points were treated by [\textit{U. Dierkes} et al., Regularity of minimal surfaces. Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften 340. Springer (2010; Zbl 1213.53003)] using higher-order derivatives of Dirichlet's energy. This theory was extended to boundary branch points by \textit{D. Wienholtz} [Der Ausschluß\ von eigentlichen Verzweigungspunkten bei Minimalflächen vom Typ der Kreisscheibe. Diplomarbeit. Universität München, SFB 256, Universität Bonn, Lecture Notes 37, (1996)]. In [\textit{U. Dierkes} et al., loc. cit.], the integer index \(m>0\) of a branch point was defined, related to the order \(n\) of the branch point through the inequality \(1+m\leq n(n+1)\) if the curvature \(\kappa\) and the torsion \(\tau\) of \(\Gamma\) are both nonzero. The cases \(1+m=2(n+1)\) and \(1+m=3(n+1)\) are called \textit{exceptional}. For boundary branch points, it was proved by \textit{D. Wienholtz} [Calc. Var. Partial Differ. Equ. 7, No. 3, 219--247 (1998; Zbl 0953.58012)] that a disc-like minimal surface with a boundary branch point satisfying \(2m-2<3n\) cannot be a minimizer in any \(C^r\) topology. In a previous paper [\textit{A. Tromba}, ``On the nonexistence of boundary branch points for minimal surfaces spanning smooth countours'', (submitted)] the author handled the cases \(3n\leq2m-2\leq 5n\) excluding \(m+1=2(n+1)\) and \(n=2\), \(m=4\). In this paper, the author shows, using higher-order derivatives of Dirichlet's energy (in the direction of forced Jacobi fields), the following result: if \(\Gamma\) is a \(C^\infty\) smooth curve with \(\kappa\tau\neq 0\), then any minimal surface spanning \(\Gamma\) cannot be a \(C^k\) local minimizer of energy or area if it has a nonexceptional branch point. The paper ends with a discussion on why the method of proof cannot be used to treat the case of exceptional branch points.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    Plateau's problem
    0 references
    branch points
    0 references
    exceptional branch points
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references