Trace spaces of counterexamples to Naimark's problem (Q1785773)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Trace spaces of counterexamples to Naimark's problem
scientific article

    Statements

    Trace spaces of counterexamples to Naimark's problem (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    1 October 2018
    0 references
    \textit{M. A. Naĭmark} proved that any two irreducible representations of $K(\mathcal{H})$ are unitarily equivalent [Usp. Mat. Nauk 3, No. 5(27), 52--145 (1948; Zbl 0036.07701)], and later asked whether this property characterizes $K(\mathcal{H})$ up to an isomorphism [\textit{M. A. Naĭmark}, Usp. Mat. Nauk 6, No. 6(46), 160--164 (1951; Zbl 0045.21402)]. To be precise, Naĭmark's problem is stated as follows: ``If $A$ is a $C^*$-algebra with only one irreducible representation up to unitary equivalence, is $A$ isomorphic to $K(\mathcal{H})$ for some (non necessarily separable) Hilbert space $\mathcal{H}$?'' \par On the one hand, from 1951 on various partial solutions to Naĭmark's problem were obtained, due to \textit{I. Kaplansky} [Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 70, 219--255 (1951; Zbl 0042.34901)], \textit{A. Rosenberg} [Am. J. Math. 75, 523--530 (1953; Zbl 0053.25903)], as well as \textit{N. Suri} and \textit{M. Tomforde} [Ill. J. Math. 61, No. 3--4, 479--495 (2017; Zbl 1414.46043)]. On the other hand, \textit{C. Akemann} and \textit{N. Weaver}, using Jensen's diamond axiom, constructed a counterexample to Naĭmark's problem generated by $\aleph_1$ elements [Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, No. 20, 7522--7525 (2004; Zbl 1064.46034)]; moreover, they showed that the existence of such a counterexample is independent of ZFC (the independence of Naĭmark's problem from ZFC remains unknown). \par In the paper under review, the author studies Akemann and Weaver's counterexamples in order to understand which kind of properties they satisfy, concentrating on trace spaces of $A$ and, more concretely, on the fixed points by the action of $\mathcal{U}(A)$ on the state space $S(A)$ by conjugacy. Apparently, it should be plausible that such counterexamples have at most one trace. Nevertheless, he shows that it is far to hold. Concretely, he shows: \par Theorem 1. Assume Jensen's diamond axiom. Then the following holds: \begin{itemize} \item[(1)] For every metrizable Choquet simplex $X$ there is a counterexample to Naĭmark's problem whose trace space is affinely homeomorphic to $X$. \item[(2)] There is a counterexample to Naĭmark's problem whose trace space is nonseparable. \end{itemize} Theorem 2. Assume Jensen's diamond axiom. For every metrizable Choquet simplex $X$ and $1\leq n\leq \aleph_0$, there is a $C^*$-algebra $A$ such that \begin{itemize} \item[(1)] $A$ is simple, unital, nuclear and of density character $\aleph_1$, \item[(2)] $A$ is not isomorphic to its opposite algebra, \item[(3)] $A$ has exactly $n$ equivalence classes of pure states, \item[(4)] all automorphisms of $A$ are inner, \item[(5)] either one of the following conditions can be obtained: \begin{itemize} \item[(a)] $T(A)$ is affinely homeomorphic to $X$. \item[(b)] $T(A)$ is nonseparable. \end{itemize} \end{itemize} A basic tool for obtaining these results is to refine Kishimoto-Ozawa-Sakai's theorem [\textit{A. Kishimoto} et al., Can. Math. Bull. 46, No. 3, 365--372 (2003; Zbl 1066.46052)].
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    Naĭmark's problem
    0 references
    trace space
    0 references
    Kishimoto-Ozawa-Sakai theorem
    0 references
    Jensen's diamond axiom
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references